Logo

Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?

Last Updated: 24.06.2025 03:18

Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?

Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.

Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.

Thank you.

Reds star Elly De La Cruz homers after learning of the death of his sister - AP News

Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.

Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.

What’s next?

Knicks-Pacers: 5 takeaways as Indiana eliminates New York, advances to 2025 Finals - NBA

Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.

Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.

Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.

What’s the worst thing you caught anyone in your family doing?

Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.

All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.

Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.

Credit cards could blow up a carefully crafted crypto compromise - Politico

Let’s just make it real clear:

Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.

Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?

Zay Flowers Is Healthy and Todd Monken Wants to Get Him the Ball More | News & Notes - Baltimore Ravens

Russia can stop this any time.

Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.

Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.

What sexual fantasies do you have?

Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?

Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.

“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.

There’s a simple solution to the Shemar Stewart impasse with the Bengals - NBC Sports

Any day of the week — including Sundays.

Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.

Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?

How is TikTok able to censor porn?

Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.

Just in the last 5 years:

Sending ATACMS is WW3.

Compass psilocybin therapy shown to be effective in largest-ever study in depression - STAT